Debate Arises Over World’s First ‘Miss AI’ Pageant

A new beauty pageant called ‘Miss AI’ has stirred controversy by judging AI-generated models on their appearance and technical skills. Hosted by the World AI Creator’s Awards and Fanvue, the pageant offers a cash prize of $5000 to the winner. Models are ranked based on their looks, social media presence, and technical aspects of their creation.

Critics argue that the pageant promotes unhealthy beauty standards by featuring AI models with “perfect” bodies, which can be created instantly with the right prompts. While the organizers claim to champion artistic talent, the pageant still perpetuates sexism and unrealistic ideals of beauty.

Moreover, many of these AI models also provide adult content, catering to the male gaze. Judges like Aitana Lopez and Emily Pelligrini are active on platforms like Fanvue, which encourages AI creators and hosts premium adult content. This normalization of mistreatment of women in the adult entertainment industry raises ethical concerns.

Unlike traditional porn, where legal repercussions exist for harmful content, AI models can be programmed without concern for harm, potentially leading to abusive or degrading material. This creates unhealthy fixations on women’s bodies and distorts perceptions of sexuality.

Additionally, AI models secure brand deals with companies like Brandy Melville and Victoria’s Secret, receiving high pay for social media posts. While AI creators argue that these models won’t replace humans, they still influence societal standards of beauty and attainability.

In conclusion, ‘Miss AI’ raises ethical questions about beauty standards, sexism, and the impact of AI on society. It highlights the need for careful consideration of the consequences of AI technology in shaping cultural norms and expectations.

Repurposed article originally published in She the people