Kamala Harris’s presidential campaign is at a critical juncture. She enjoys widespread media approval and public enthusiasm. Yet, there’s growing pressure for her to break her silence and engage more directly with the press. This call is not merely about media relations. It’s a fundamental test of her commitment to transparency and accountability as she seeks the nation’s highest office.

If Kamala Harris is truly “for the people”, as she has long claimed, she needs to speak to their representatives – flawed as they may be.’ Photograph: Kevin Mohatt/Reuters

Harris’s ascendency has been met with glowing coverage. For example, she was recently featured on the cover of Time magazine, which proclaimed this as “Her Moment.” Yet, behind the favorable headlines, there’s a lack of substantive dialogue. Reporters have largely posed trivial questions. They focus on Donald Trump’s attacks rather than pressing Harris on her policies or vision for the presidency. This approach has allowed her to sidestep difficult questions. It leaves the public in the dark about where she stands on key issues.

The lack of clarity on Harris’s positions has not gone unnoticed. Critics, including journalist Jay Caspian Kang, have pointed out that Harris has yet to fully explain her shifts on significant policy issues. These include fracking, Medicare for all, and her stance on international conflicts. These are not minor details but critical aspects of what a Harris administration would represent. As pressure mounts, Harris must confront these questions head-on. She must recognize that her obligation to the public transcends the comfort of controlled messaging.

The demands for Harris to engage with the press are intensifying, and rightly so. The role of the press in a democracy is to challenge those in power. It is to demand answers on behalf of the public. Harris’s reluctance to participate in this dialogue risks alienating voters who expect transparency from their leaders.

As the campaign progresses, Harris faces a choice: continue to avoid the press or embrace the opportunity to define her candidacy with clarity and conviction. A comprehensive press conference or in-depth interview could dispel the growing concerns about her inaccessibility. The stakes are high, and the time for Harris to address these issues is now. If she truly embodies the “for the people” mantra, there is no better way to demonstrate it than by engaging openly with those she seeks to serve.

Subha KS- Staff Reporter