Labour Considers Ending Cap Amid Political Pressure
![](https://i0.wp.com/shesightmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Screen-Shot-2024-07-25-at-10.21.48-AM-1.png?fit=512%2C305&ssl=1)
UK Labour Party leader Keir Starmer is actively considering the removal of the controversial two-child benefit cap, signaling a potential major policy shift. This cap currently restricts welfare payments to families with more than two children, a policy widely criticized for exacerbating child poverty across the United Kingdom.
![](https://i0.wp.com/shesightmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Screen-Shot-2024-07-25-at-10.21.48-AM.png?resize=512%2C305&ssl=1)
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson has noted that the abolition of the cap is under consideration as part of a comprehensive review aimed at reducing child poverty. Starmer has publicly supported this stance, emphasizing the importance of robust, multifaceted strategies to address the issue. He articulated this commitment during a press conference at the Farnborough international airshow, highlighting the government’s dedication to formulating effective social policies.
The debate over this policy has intensified as the Liberal Democrats have introduced an amendment to end the two-child limit. With a parliamentary vote looming, this amendment forms part of a broader dialogue that includes significant reforms in health and social care, signaling a pivotal shift in the political landscape regarding family welfare.The policy has also drawn criticism from across the political spectrum. Former Conservative Home Secretary Suella Braverman has voiced strong objections to the cap, citing its particularly detrimental effects on young and large families, and aligning herself with the growing chorus advocating for change.
The internal dynamics within the Labour Party also reflect a division of opinion. Some members are calling for immediate action to end the cap, while others, like Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, suggest a more measured approach. Kendall has indicated that the decision to scrap the cap is being meticulously reviewed by a newly established child poverty taskforce, pointing to ongoing debates about the most responsible way to address child poverty without precipitating fiscal imprudence.
Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves has expressed concerns about the financial implications of removing the cap, which incurs an approximate annual cost of £3 billion. She stressed the necessity of fiscal responsibility, asserting that the party cannot responsibly promise to scrap the cap without a clear and viable plan to manage the financial burden.
As Labour navigates these complex discussions, Starmer faces a critical test of his leadership. The party’s ability to coalesce around a financially and socially responsible policy could be crucial for its credibility and effectiveness in tackling systemic child poverty. The decisions made in the coming days will not only shape the future of this particular policy but will also have a significant impact on the party’s strategy and unity moving forward.
Re-reported from the article originally published in THE GUARDIAN.