The Republican Party’s Stance on Women’s Rights

As the U.S. approaches another crucial election, the Republican Party’s stance on women’s rights remains a contentious issue, often softened or overlooked by mainstream media. A typical example can be seen in a recent CNN article that initially downplays President Trump’s controversial treatment of women by highlighting positive testimonials from Republican women, only touching upon his serious allegations of sexual misconduct later in the piece.

D Vance (left) and Trump at their first joint rally in Grand Rapids, Michigan, on 20 July 2024. Photograph: Tom Brenner/Reuters

Trump’s troubling history with women includes rape accusations from his first wife in her 1990 divorce testimony and a civil lawsuit for sexual assault and defamation won by E. Jean Carroll. Despite these allegations, the Republican Party has continued to support Trump as their presidential candidate, with JD Vance as his running mate. Vance himself has promoted policies that could significantly undermine women’s rights and safety.

Notably, Vance has vocally opposed a federal proposal intended to protect the privacy of women’s reproductive health care records, an act that critics have dubbed “menstrual surveillance.” He also supports a stringent national abortion ban with no exceptions and has made derogatory remarks about women who choose not to have children.

In 2022, Vance controversially suggested that women should remain in violent marriages for the sake of their children, a stance that starkly contrasts with the progress made by the feminist movement. The feminist movement has significantly advanced awareness of domestic violence, established shelters, and pressured law enforcement to take these crimes seriously, helping to empower women economically and legally to escape abusive situations.

The upcoming election is more than a measure of the candidates’ personalities; it is a referendum on pivotal issues such as climate change, the economy, the survival of democracy in America, and the composition of the Supreme Court. Rebecca Solnit argues that the stances on women’s rights taken by candidates are crucial. President Biden, for instance, has a longstanding record of supporting legislation against violence towards women, contrasting sharply with the positions held by Trump and Vance.

As the election nears, it is essential to consider these broader issues and how they intersect with the protection and advancement of women’s rights. The decisions made at the polls this November will have profound implications not only on policies but also on the fundamental rights and dignity afforded to women in the United States. Voters must weigh these considerations carefully as they decide the future direction of the nation.

Re-reported from the article originally published in The Guardian.