New House Speaker Sparks Abortion Concerns

Louisiana Representative Mike Johnson clinched the position of US House Speaker with a 220-209 vote, defeating Democrat leader Hakeem Jeffries. His victory has raised alarm bells for Planned Parenthood Action Fund, a nonprofit organization focused on reproductive and sexual healthcare.

Planned Parenthood‘s CEO, Alexis McGill, expressed apprehension about Johnson’s new role. She fears that the Speaker may pursue a federal abortion ban, given his extensive history of opposing abortion rights and reproductive health services. McGill pointed out that House Republicans, including those branding themselves as moderates, have opted for Johnson as Speaker, thus embracing extremism and endorsing a national abortion ban agenda. She stated, “Mike Johnson has a long and disastrous record of attacking abortion rights and the full suite of sexual and reproductive health care services,” further adding that Johnson’s appointment signifies a commitment to stripping away these rights.

McGill went on to criticize Congress for selecting what she termed “another out-of-touch and dangerous politician” to lead their efforts. She argued that this move threatens to curtail individuals’ rights and called for better representation for communities.

It is worth noting that while Mike Johnson has previously advocated for a nationwide abortion ban, such legislation would face substantial opposition in a Democratic Senate and from President Joe Biden. Therefore, its passage is considered highly improbable.

Beyond his stance on abortion, Johnson has taken positions on other social issues. He voted against a bipartisan bill that codified same-sex marriage, a legislation signed into law by President Biden in 2022. Additionally, he authored the “Stop the Sexualization of Children Act of 2022,” which seeks to prohibit federal funding for programs, events, or literature with sexual content aimed at children under the age of 10. Critics have likened this bill to a federal “don’t say gay” measure, asserting that it aims to limit discussions about LGBTQ individuals.

Re-reported from the article originally published in The Times Now News English